Immigrants from Central America vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 532,931,257 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.066% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 1,066.1 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $49,989, a difference of 2.1%), and median male earnings ($45,538 compared to $46,147, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($39,762 compared to $39,834, a difference of 0.18%), median household income ($74,217 compared to $74,399, a difference of 0.24%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,012 compared to $80,427, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 33.6%, a difference of 0.040%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and single father poverty (16.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (44.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.49 compared to 3.48, a difference of 0.51%), single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 9.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (35.0% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 8.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and male disability (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.52%), disability age over 75 (50.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.6%).