Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Mexican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,915,426 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mexicans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Mexicans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 43.7 Mexicans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $34,559, a difference of 55.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $80,427, a difference of 46.8%), and median family income ($125,150 compared to $85,618, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $49,989, a difference of 14.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $53,897, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 59.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 57.6%), and receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 57.6%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 56.3%), and births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 47.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.4%), family households (64.9% compared to 69.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 92.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 43.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 153.0%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 138.8%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 114.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.96%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.96%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Mexican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 41.2%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 6.1%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and female disability (10.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 15.9%).