Bhutanese vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,079,434 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.435. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 1.9 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $76,903, a difference of 53.1%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $79,563, a difference of 50.6%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $68,423, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 18.8%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $47,907, a difference of 19.1%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $33,894, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 96.4%), receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 86.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.11%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 128.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 80.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 99.4%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 83.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.30, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 56.8%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 35.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 75.4%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 71.4%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 96.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 61.5%), and male disability (11.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.9%).