Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,204,875 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 42.0 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $76,903, a difference of 37.1%), median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $42,581, a difference of 36.2%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $79,563, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,907, a difference of 11.0%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $51,719, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 56.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 56.2%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 48.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 120.6%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 96.8%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.60%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.30, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.6%), no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.99%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 63.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 97.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 54.5%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 10.2%).