Pima vs Menominee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,302,680 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Menominee within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 26.043% in Menominee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 26,043.1 Menominee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $34,578, a difference of 12.8%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $68,423, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $42,581, a difference of 0.53%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $37,884, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $51,719, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 125.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 118.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 111.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 4.1%), single female poverty (30.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 109.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 109.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 18.1%), currently married (35.9% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 17.8%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.30, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 51.1%, a difference of 0.70%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and single father households (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 58.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.4%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 17.6%), and ged/equivalency (76.4% compared to 86.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Menominee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 116.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.7%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.56%), disability (13.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.80%).