Bhutanese vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,675,982 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.121. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($100,151 compared to $54,644, a difference of 83.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $60,305, a difference of 81.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $65,113, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 26.5%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $32,500, a difference of 34.3%), and median earnings ($52,297 compared to $36,876, a difference of 41.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 153.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 149.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 148.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 68.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 70.7%), and single female poverty (17.7% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 86.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 105.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 80.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 72.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.4%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.32, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 1.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 120.9%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 113.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 85.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.010%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 79.4%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 72.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 65.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%).