Crow vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,085,447 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.107. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $34,584, a difference of 35.9%), householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $40,550, a difference of 21.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,337 compared to $60,305, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,434 compared to $41,715, a difference of 1.7%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $36,876, a difference of 5.0%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $29,845, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 70.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 23.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (32.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 1.8%), family poverty (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and male poverty (19.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 266.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 263.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (13.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 196.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (14.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 17.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.5%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.4% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 35.6%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (99.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (99.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 38.1%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.3%).