Choctaw vs Lumbee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,600,212 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.251% in Lumbee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 250.9 Lumbee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 31.9%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $34,584, a difference of 31.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $40,550, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $32,500, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($40,270 compared to $36,876, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $41,715, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 68.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 59.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 57.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 18.8%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 21.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 28.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 52.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 50.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 30.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.2%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (64.9% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.32, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.65%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.1%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Lumbee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 39.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.84%), male disability (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.0%).