Bhutanese vs Kiowa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bhutanese

Kiowa

Exceptional
Poor
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Kiowa Integration in Bhutanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,424,823 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.394. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Kiowa.
Bhutanese Integration in Kiowa Communities

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $74,815, a difference of 57.4%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $65,914, a difference of 51.9%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $80,885, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.3%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $44,733, a difference of 27.6%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $34,074, a difference of 28.1%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Income
Income MetricBhutaneseKiowa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,894
Tragic
$35,102
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,800
Tragic
$80,885
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$100,151
Tragic
$65,914
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,297
Tragic
$39,232
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,759
Tragic
$45,094
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,648
Tragic
$34,074
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,078
Tragic
$44,733
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,520
Tragic
$74,776
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$117,750
Tragic
$74,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,288
Tragic
$51,140
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
23.6%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 85.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 83.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 76.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 16.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 36.8%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 38.4%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Poverty
Poverty MetricBhutaneseKiowa
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
16.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Tragic
29.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
24.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
22.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.6%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.9%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.4%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBhutaneseKiowa
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBhutaneseKiowa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.3%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.4%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.7%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.5%
Tragic
78.3%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 54.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.66%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBhutaneseKiowa
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
43.1%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 14.0%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBhutaneseKiowa
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.2%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Fair
6.2%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 76.4%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 58.7%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.020%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Education Level
Education Level MetricBhutaneseKiowa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.0%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.2%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.3%
Tragic
57.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.4%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.7%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.5%

Bhutanese vs Kiowa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 76.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 13.0%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.9%).
Bhutanese vs Kiowa Disability
Disability MetricBhutaneseKiowa
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
17.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.5%
Tragic
32.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
54.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%