Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Kiowa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Kiowa

Excellent
Poor
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,045
SOCIAL INDEX
18.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
274th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Kiowa Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,236,887 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.752. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.202% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 202.5 Kiowa.
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Kiowa Communities

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $74,815, a difference of 49.6%), per capita income ($51,770 compared to $35,102, a difference of 47.5%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $65,914, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $44,733, a difference of 21.5%), and median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $34,074, a difference of 27.9%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$51,770
Tragic
$35,102
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$116,165
Tragic
$80,885
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,319
Tragic
$65,914
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,361
Tragic
$39,232
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,217
Tragic
$45,094
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,571
Tragic
$34,074
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,352
Tragic
$44,733
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$106,888
Tragic
$74,776
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,914
Tragic
$74,815
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,376
Tragic
$51,140
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.6%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 67.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 24.5%, a difference of 65.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 62.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.6%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 29.7%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
16.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
15.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Tragic
29.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
19.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
24.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
22.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Tragic
22.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
35.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.9%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 42.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Tragic
25.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
7.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
62.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Average
36.6%
Excellent
37.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.0%
Tragic
73.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.8%
Tragic
79.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
78.3%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 51.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 3.3%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.27, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
61.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.2%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
42.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.27
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.4%
Tragic
43.1%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 0.27%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
11.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Tragic
88.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
54.1%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Average
19.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Fair
6.2%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 88.8%), master's degree (18.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 71.3%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Good
93.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Fair
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.7%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.6%
Tragic
57.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.1%
Tragic
51.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.9%
Tragic
36.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
28.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.5%
Tragic
10.8%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 74.1%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 61.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 55.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 15.4%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.4%).
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Kiowa Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CzechoslovakiaKiowa
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
15.6%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
17.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
32.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
54.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.2%
Tragic
18.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%