Choctaw vs Kiowa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,288,621 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Kiowa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Kiowa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $74,815, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $65,914, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $34,074, a difference of 0.89%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $44,733, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $35,102, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (27.2% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.94%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.27, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.6%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and associate's degree (37.8% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Kiowa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.19%), disability (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 1.4%).