Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Western Europe
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Western Europe
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 490,157,705 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Western Europe |
| Minimum | 0.90% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 13.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 12.3% | 96.2% |
| Mean | 6.3% | 17.5% |
| Median | 5.4% | 8.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 10.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 23.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 23.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Western Europe by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and Hungarian (5.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Europe are Hungarian (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Colombia (5.1%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
| Ukrainians | 88.4 /100 | #120 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Mongolians | 88.4 /100 | #121 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 88.2 /100 | #122 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 87.7 /100 | #123 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 87.5 /100 | #124 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
| Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
| Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |
| Brazilians | 79.3 /100 | #140 | Good 5.2% |