Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 347,061,531 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 64.3 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $50,065, a difference of 14.3%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $112,688, a difference of 9.1%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $60,334, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,957, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,933, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.27%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 11.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.3%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.34%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 39.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.3%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%).