Choctaw vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,997,952 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $50,065, a difference of 39.1%), median family income ($84,835 compared to $112,688, a difference of 32.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $108,824, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,957, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $64,933, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 42.2%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 5.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.9%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.14, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (64.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 77.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 68.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 61.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 47.5%), and hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.2%).