Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,222,286 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $62,292, a difference of 16.1%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $91,015, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $107,378, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,894 compared to $48,747, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $42,386, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 4.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.68%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.0%), married-couple households (49.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 55.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 41.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.0%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (51.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.81%).