Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,848,592 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.965. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.115% in Immigrants from Kazakhstan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 114.5 Immigrants from Kazakhstan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $48,747, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $42,386, a difference of 9.4%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $62,292, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $53,990, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $107,378, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.33%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.88%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 19.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.17, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 63.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 73.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 29.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 86.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 30.5%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 30.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.42%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Kazakhstan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 2.7%).