Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,970,515 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.999. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.370% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 369.9 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 74.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $50,747, a difference of 19.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $85,552, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,596, a difference of 2.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,538, a difference of 6.5%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $41,123, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 72.8%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 67.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 67.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 56.4%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 52.2%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 65.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.5%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 29.4%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.9%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.34, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 378.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 160.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 139.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 108.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 139.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 70.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 30.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.0%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 60.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.1%).