Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Grenada
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from Grenada

Fair
Poor
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,656
SOCIAL INDEX
14.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
293rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Grenada Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,816,769 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.055. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Grenada.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from Grenada Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 74.0%), median female earnings ($33,775 compared to $41,932, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,538, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $85,552, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $50,747, a difference of 4.6%), and median family income ($84,835 compared to $89,249, a difference of 5.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$41,123
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$89,249
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$76,517
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,596
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Tragic
$50,279
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Exceptional
$41,932
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Exceptional
$54,538
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Tragic
$88,311
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$85,552
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$50,747
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
16.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 42.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.1%), and receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 21.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.28%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
15.8%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.4%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
20.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
21.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
21.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Tragic
20.7%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Fair
13.0%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
21.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Tragic
16.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
30.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
17.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
17.8%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 35.7%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
7.6%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Average
7.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 49.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
25.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Tragic
67.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
81.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.4%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 22.6%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (64.9% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
25.2%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
37.5%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
39.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Good
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
36.3%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 375.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 184.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 153.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 47.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 106.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 153.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
37.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
62.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Tragic
28.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Tragic
9.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
2.7%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.0%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
95.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
93.0%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
91.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
90.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
88.4%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
85.6%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
81.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
59.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
54.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
42.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
35.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Poor
14.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 107.6%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 98.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%), self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 9.9%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from Grenada Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from Grenada
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Fair
12.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Exceptional
0.94%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Good
11.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.8%