Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Grenada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,580,522 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Grenada within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.405. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.281% in Immigrants from Grenada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to a decrease of 281.1 Immigrants from Grenada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 68.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $85,552, a difference of 30.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $50,747, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,837 compared to $41,932, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $54,538, a difference of 7.0%), and median earnings ($51,758 compared to $45,596, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 77.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 58.8%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.10%), single father poverty (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 47.1%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.64%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 41.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.4%), married-couple households (46.5% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.1% compared to 62.6%, a difference of 0.90%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 227.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 123.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 89.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 108.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 75.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.6%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Grenada communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.8%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.94%, a difference of 33.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.93%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.9%).