Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,769,922 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.922. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.397% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 397.3 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.1%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $53,237, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $52,643, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,965 compared to $85,054, a difference of 0.10%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $43,464, a difference of 0.79%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,186, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.9%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 17.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.3%), currently married (48.8% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.61%), family households (64.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 0.22%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.38%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%).