Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,079,630 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $53,237, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and median family income ($107,715 compared to $101,354, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $52,643, a difference of 2.5%), per capita income ($45,066 compared to $43,464, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $39,186, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.3%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.48%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.92%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.52%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.090%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 14.1%), no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.2%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.13%).