Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,150,847 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.437. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Costa Rica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Immigrants from Costa Rica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $59,848, a difference of 20.8%), median family income ($119,800 compared to $101,354, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($109,520 compared to $92,876, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $52,643, a difference of 8.4%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $39,186, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 33.2%), family poverty (7.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 2.6%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and single male poverty (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 5.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 35.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.5%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.37%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.37%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.1%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.5%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Immigrants from Costa Rica communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.060%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.88%).