Immigrants from Norway vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,694,027 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Immigrant from Norway communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Norway within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Norway corresponds to a decrease of 15.8 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,984 compared to $55,743, a difference of 9.3%), householder income over 65 years ($66,118 compared to $62,162, a difference of 6.4%), and wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,669 compared to $111,430, a difference of 0.21%), median household income ($94,846 compared to $94,399, a difference of 0.47%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,629 compared to $107,393, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 17.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 15.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.27%), male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.17, a difference of 0.98%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 46.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.8%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.090%), 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Norway and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 16.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.37%), female disability (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.0%).