Japanese vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,961,214 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.494. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to a decrease of 15.8 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,870 compared to $50,303, a difference of 26.2%), median male earnings ($51,473 compared to $62,658, a difference of 21.7%), and median earnings ($44,825 compared to $53,043, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $55,743, a difference of 6.5%), householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $62,162, a difference of 7.3%), and wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 23.1%), receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 22.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.1%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.35 compared to 3.17, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 77.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 40.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.4%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 55.9%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.4%).