Pima vs Immigrants from Belarus Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,085,314 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.044% in Immigrants from Belarus. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 43.7 Immigrants from Belarus.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $50,303, a difference of 64.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $111,430, a difference of 51.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $94,399, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $55,743, a difference of 8.2%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $62,162, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 115.2%), married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 112.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 111.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 7.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 53.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 153.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 124.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 118.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.0%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 124.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 100.8%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 50.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (65.9% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 65.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 42.0%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 104.3%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 94.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 74.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.13%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Belarus communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 77.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 67.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 66.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 3.8%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.1%).