Immigrants from Denmark vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,282,937 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.129% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to a decrease of 129.0 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $42,950, a difference of 25.3%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 23.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,363 compared to $90,372, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $50,609, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $40,257, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($53,186 compared to $46,564, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 32.8%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.84%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.0%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 32.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.2%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.2%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.8%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.9%).