Scottish vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,356,215 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.858. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.411% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 411.2 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 25.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $97,284, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $40,257, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $50,609, a difference of 0.11%), median earnings ($46,463 compared to $46,564, a difference of 0.22%), and median household income ($85,101 compared to $83,289, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 29.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.51%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.5%), married-couple households (49.0% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and currently married (49.2% compared to 43.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 3.4%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 85.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 70.1%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and high school diploma (91.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), associate's degree (46.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.7%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%).