Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 177,690,392 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Africa within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.114% in Immigrants from Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to a decrease of 113.8 Immigrants from Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 13.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $97,284, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $90,372, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,370 compared to $50,609, a difference of 1.5%), median female earnings ($40,977 compared to $40,257, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($48,673 compared to $46,564, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 19.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.8%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.6%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.98%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.4%), births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and married-couple households (47.7% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (65.0% compared to 62.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.6%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.7%).