Pima vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Crow
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,572,023 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 43.7 Crow.
Pima vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $71,337, a difference of 16.1%), wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $47,012, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,266, a difference of 0.17%), median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $42,434, a difference of 0.18%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $63,681, a difference of 0.66%).
Income Metric | Pima | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Pima vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 105.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 49.8%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.090%), poverty (21.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and male poverty (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.5%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Pima vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 169.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 163.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 8.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | Crow |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 12.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 11.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 5.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 78.3% |
Pima vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 27.6%), single father households (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.8%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.95%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.82, a difference of 2.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | Crow |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 40.4% |
Pima vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Pima vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.0%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 24.3%), and bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 99.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 99.6%, a difference of 1.5%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.5% |
Pima vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 38.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), disability (13.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 7.0%).
Disability Metric | Pima | Crow |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Poor 2.5% |