Arapaho vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Arapaho
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Arapaho
Crow
2,537
SOCIAL INDEX
22.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
252nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Arapaho Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 9,784,125 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Crow within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.230. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to a decrease of 24.7 Crow.
Arapaho vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $49,234, a difference of 20.6%), and median female earnings ($31,489 compared to $35,266, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($71,697 compared to $71,337, a difference of 0.50%), median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $42,434, a difference of 1.6%), and per capita income ($32,345 compared to $31,729, a difference of 1.9%).
Income Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,345 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,064 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $67,965 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,586 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $41,758 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $31,489 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,003 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,697 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $75,945 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Poor $59,383 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.5% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Arapaho vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 45.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 34.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.1%), single male poverty (21.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 15.5%).
Poverty Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.5% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.4% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 24.0% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.4% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.6% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.7% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Arapaho vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 220.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 198.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.1%), and male unemployment (11.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
Unemployment | Tragic 9.8% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Tragic 11.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 8.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.3% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 25.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 7.5% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 16.8% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Arapaho vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (74.4% compared to 73.3%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.1% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 74.4% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.3% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.8% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 76.6% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.5% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 78.1% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 77.1% | Tragic 78.3% |
Arapaho vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.1%), births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 16.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (40.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.43%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 41.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (66.5% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
Family Households | Exceptional 66.5% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.6% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.64 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.5% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 47.1% | Tragic 40.4% |
Arapaho vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 50.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 17.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.7% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.2% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 26.4% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Arapaho vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.6%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.17%), college, under 1 year (60.3% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and 9th grade (95.7% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.35%).
Education Level Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.4% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.5% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 82.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.3% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.1% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 36.7% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 26.6% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Arapaho vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Crow communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 0.44%), and disability age 65 to 74 (28.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.54%).
Disability Metric | Arapaho | Crow |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 13.0% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Fair 1.3% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 15.1% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.1% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.8% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.1% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.8% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Poor 2.5% |