Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Congo
Crow
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Congo
Crow
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Crow Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,656,090 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Crow within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.391. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.057% in Crow. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 56.6 Crow.
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 13.8%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $31,729, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $47,012, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $71,337, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $38,707, a difference of 1.2%), and median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $35,266, a difference of 2.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $35,720 | Tragic $31,729 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $82,216 | Tragic $76,605 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $66,768 | Tragic $63,681 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $39,169 | Tragic $38,707 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $44,204 | Tragic $42,434 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,317 | Tragic $35,266 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $43,266 | Tragic $47,012 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $72,178 | Tragic $71,337 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $77,850 | Tragic $74,257 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $51,393 | Tragic $49,234 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.7% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 96.8%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 67.7%), and married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 5.4%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.2%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
Poverty | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 20.7% |
Families | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 16.1% |
Males | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 19.1% |
Females | Tragic 17.4% | Tragic 22.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.6% | Tragic 33.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.7% | Tragic 22.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 31.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 22.5% | Tragic 26.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 22.4% | Tragic 26.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 22.7% | Tragic 26.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 23.3% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 32.4% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 30.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.8% | Tragic 38.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.1% | Tragic 9.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 15.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 13.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 274.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 267.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 231.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Tragic 11.1% |
Males | Average 5.3% | Tragic 10.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 20.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 18.7% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 15.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 10.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Tragic 15.7% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 17.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 16.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 78.6%, a difference of 7.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 60.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 73.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.7% | Exceptional 38.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 78.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Fair 84.6% | Tragic 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Tragic 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 78.3% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 39.0%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.82, a difference of 18.4%), and family households (59.2% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.18%), currently married (41.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 4.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
Family Households | Tragic 59.2% | Exceptional 65.3% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.3% | Fair 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 39.0% | Tragic 41.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.82 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 3.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.1% | Tragic 7.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 41.1% | Tragic 40.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 14.1% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.8% | Tragic 40.4% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 22.5%, a difference of 32.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 55.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Fair 89.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.1% | Good 55.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 22.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 45.8%), bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (83.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.83%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and high school diploma (87.0% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 99.7% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 99.7% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 99.6% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 99.6% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 99.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 99.6% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 99.5% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 99.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 99.1% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.9% | Exceptional 99.0% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 96.1% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.4% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Excellent 92.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.0% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Poor 88.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.1% | Tragic 83.8% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.7% | Tragic 60.2% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 54.5% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.8% | Tragic 37.6% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.6% | Tragic 27.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 10.6% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.6% | Tragic 3.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.5% |
Immigrants from Congo vs Crow Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Crow communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability (12.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Congo | Crow |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Males | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.7% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.0% | Tragic 27.9% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Tragic 49.6% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.7% | Fair 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Poor 6.2% | Tragic 6.9% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Poor 2.5% |