Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Costa Rican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Costa Ricans

Average
Average
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,399
SOCIAL INDEX
51.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
177th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Costa Rican Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,191,972 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.461. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Costa Ricans.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Costa Rican Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,638, a difference of 4.5%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $54,279, a difference of 2.6%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $44,090, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $102,779, a difference of 0.90%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $53,106, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Good
$44,090
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Good
$103,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Excellent
$87,262
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Average
$46,645
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Average
$54,279
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Average
$39,622
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Exceptional
$53,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Good
$95,565
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Good
$102,779
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Good
$61,638
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Good
12.2%
Families
Good
8.7%
Average
9.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Average
13.3%
Good
13.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Good
13.2%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Good
16.9%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Good
16.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Good
16.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Good
16.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Average
12.8%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Good
20.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Average
29.0%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Average
11.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 9.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Good
17.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Average
6.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Poor
7.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Average
5.5%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.49%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Fair
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Average
82.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 6.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), married-couple households (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.92%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Excellent
47.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Average
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Fair
6.5%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Fair
32.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
90.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Exceptional
56.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 3.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
91.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Poor
64.4%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.6%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Fair
46.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Average
37.7%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Average
15.0%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Average
1.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Costa Rican Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaCosta Rican
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Good
11.0%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Excellent
22.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Excellent
46.9%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Average
2.2%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
17.0%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Excellent
2.4%