Pima vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,456,899 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,090, a difference of 43.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $102,779, a difference of 40.1%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $87,262, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,106, a difference of 3.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $39,622, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $95,565, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 121.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 103.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 91.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 10.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 152.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 113.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 113.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 15.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 77.8%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 57.4%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 4.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 62.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 61.8%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.39%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 70.7%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.2%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.7%).