Crow vs Costa Rican Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,303,389 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.160. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.181% in Costa Ricans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 181.3 Costa Ricans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,090, a difference of 39.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $102,779, a difference of 38.4%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $87,262, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,622, a difference of 12.3%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $53,106, a difference of 13.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,645, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 86.1%), married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 85.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.8%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 33.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 237.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 225.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 220.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.7%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 23.4%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.26, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 56.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 41.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Costa Rican communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.8%).