Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,357,820 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.696. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 25.5 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $76,362, a difference of 38.1%), median household income ($90,026 compared to $66,974, a difference of 34.4%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $81,385, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $54,096, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $45,275, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 81.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 73.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 64.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 133.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 88.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 88.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 40.1%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.57%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.47, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 46.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.0%), professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.5%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.7% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.15%), 9th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and 4th grade (97.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 53.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 44.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.3%).