Pima vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,633,091 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.636. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.060% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 59.9 Cheyenne.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $35,276, a difference of 15.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $45,275, a difference of 13.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $35,673, a difference of 0.98%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $76,362, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $79,152, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 60.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 42.7%), and receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (30.3% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 64.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.0%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 24.5%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.93%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in associate's degree (30.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 27.9%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 26.9%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 24.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.14%), male disability (12.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%).