Romanian vs Cheyenne Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Cheyenne

Excellent
Poor
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cheyenne Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 71,575,719 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cheyenne within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.933. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.207% in Cheyenne. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 206.9 Cheyenne.
Romanian Integration in Cheyenne Communities

Romanian vs Cheyenne Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $76,362, a difference of 42.2%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $66,974, a difference of 37.4%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $35,276, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,663 compared to $35,673, a difference of 16.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,632 compared to $45,275, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,142 compared to $54,096, a difference of 18.6%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Income
Income MetricRomanianCheyenne
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Tragic
$35,276
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Tragic
$81,385
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Tragic
$66,974
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Tragic
$40,233
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Tragic
$46,062
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Tragic
$35,673
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$45,275
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Tragic
$79,152
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Tragic
$76,362
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Tragic
$54,096
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
23.3%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 95.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 77.3%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 29.0%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianCheyenne
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Tragic
20.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
28.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
28.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
25.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
25.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
26.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Tragic
30.4%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Tragic
38.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
9.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.3%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 141.9%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 91.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 90.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianCheyenne
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.0%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.6%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
14.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Tragic
22.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
7.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
7.8%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 77.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 73.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 4.5%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianCheyenne
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
62.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
74.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
37.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Tragic
73.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Tragic
81.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
77.6%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 43.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.83%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.47, a difference of 9.2%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianCheyenne
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Tragic
63.2%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
42.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.47
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
42.2%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
13.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
41.3%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 33.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.1%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianCheyenne
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
22.7%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
8.3%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 41.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianCheyenne
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Average
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Tragic
82.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
60.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Tragic
54.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Tragic
38.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Tragic
29.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.6%

Romanian vs Cheyenne Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Cheyenne communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 40.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.8%).
Romanian vs Cheyenne Disability
Disability MetricRomanianCheyenne
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Tragic
31.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%