Bhutanese vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,631,417 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.032. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 1.0 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($100,151 compared to $73,509, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $86,595, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $88,717, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $48,603, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,864, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 29.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.24, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.3%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 56.5%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 12.9%).