Finnish vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 252,159,183 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $81,531, a difference of 16.0%), median family income ($102,676 compared to $88,717, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $86,595, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,173 compared to $35,864, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $48,603, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($45,940 compared to $41,822, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 48.2%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 28.7%), female unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 31.9%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 19.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and average family size (3.09 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.8%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 16.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.0%).