Scottish vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 307,730,560 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.859. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.353% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 353.5 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $86,595, a difference of 17.9%), per capita income ($44,440 compared to $37,695, a difference of 17.9%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $88,717, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $48,603, a difference of 4.0%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $35,864, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $41,822, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 44.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 44.5%), and family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (30.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.4%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 30.0%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 19.5%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.24, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 43.0%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 31.8%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.10%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 4.3%).