Crow vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,484,504 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.829. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.228% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 227.6 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,862, a difference of 57.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $110,103, a difference of 48.3%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $93,960, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,154, a difference of 15.2%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $41,952, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $50,399, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 101.9%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 95.3%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.8%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 30.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 256.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 225.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 219.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.8%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 34.6%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 18.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 87.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 71.0%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 55.8%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 52.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.1%).