Bhutanese vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,637,922 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($72,288 compared to $65,246, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $110,103, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($100,151 compared to $93,960, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.020%), per capita income ($49,894 compared to $49,862, a difference of 0.070%), and median male earnings ($61,759 compared to $60,117, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.97%), single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and single mother poverty (25.6% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.2%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).