Choctaw vs Argentinean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 176,964,033 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Argentineans within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.906. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Argentineans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 42.5 Argentineans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,999 compared to $49,862, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $93,960, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $110,103, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $54,154, a difference of 19.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $65,246, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 53.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 44.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.2%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.38%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 41.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 83.6%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.7%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Argentinean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 74.9%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 66.2%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.3%).