Crow vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 30,794,983 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.358% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 357.8 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $47,284, a difference of 49.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $100,435, a difference of 35.2%), and median family income ($76,605 compared to $103,010, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $49,267, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $40,060, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $47,023, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 83.4%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 70.0%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 12.6%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 222.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 216.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 202.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 63.8%), average family size (3.82 compared to 3.14, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 5.9%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 64.9%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 58.8%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.31%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and high school diploma (88.4% compared to 89.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 33.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.0%).