Immigrants from Oceania vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,642,830 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.198. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $49,267, a difference of 9.0%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $85,053, a difference of 4.8%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $47,284, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,060, a difference of 0.59%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $55,380, a difference of 0.60%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,023, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 23.5%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.41%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 46.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.2%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.5%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.36%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (46.5% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.0%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 15.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 2.2%).