Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Alsatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,913,604 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alsatians within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Alsatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 173.9 Alsatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($108,830 compared to $103,010, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $49,267, a difference of 5.4%), and median household income ($89,496 compared to $85,053, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,394 compared to $47,284, a difference of 0.23%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,880 compared to $95,059, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 25.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 24.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father poverty (16.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 47.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 11.5%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.15%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 33.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.1%), bachelor's degree (42.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and associate's degree (50.5% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Alsatian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.2%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.68%).