Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,859,608 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.686% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 686.0 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,531 compared to $39,558, a difference of 17.6%), median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $49,711, a difference of 16.7%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $43,750, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,000, a difference of 1.5%), householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $60,748, a difference of 2.9%), and wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 42.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 33.1%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 79.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 64.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 63.6%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 45.6%, a difference of 0.74%), currently married (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 38.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.6%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 47.2%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 0.32%), high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and 11th grade (92.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 152.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.4%).