Bhutanese vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,246,182 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to a decrease of 12.6 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,894 compared to $39,558, a difference of 26.1%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $79,509, a difference of 26.0%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $95,573, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $54,000, a difference of 5.7%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 10.5%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $38,202, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 69.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 51.5%), and family poverty (7.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 82.1%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 68.0%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 65.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.37, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 99.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.1%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and 5th grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 151.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 47.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.4%).