Crow vs Alaska Native Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,466,179 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Alaska Natives within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.074% in Alaska Natives. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 73.9 Alaska Natives.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 28.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $93,991, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $79,509, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $38,202, a difference of 8.3%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $43,750, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,000, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 67.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (26.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 24.9%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 167.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 155.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 148.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (26.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.82 compared to 3.37, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and currently married (40.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.31%), single father households (3.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 57.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.2%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and master's degree (10.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Alaska Native communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 137.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.86%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%).