Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Single Male
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
North Carolina
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina

0.0%
100.0%
Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina Map

Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina

City Single Male Poverty vs State vs National
1. Forest Oaks 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#1 12.4% (+87.6)#24
2. Surf City 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#2 12.4% (+87.6)#27
3. Red Springs 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#3 12.4% (+87.6)#46
4. Spruce Pine 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#4 12.4% (+87.6)#71
5. Pinebluff 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#5 12.4% (+87.6)#118
6. Fairplains 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#6 12.4% (+87.6)#124
7. Vander 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#7 12.4% (+87.6)#150
8. Cordova 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#8 12.4% (+87.6)#173
9. Toast 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#9 12.4% (+87.6)#193
10. South Henderson 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#10 12.4% (+87.6)#199
11. Lucama 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#11 12.4% (+87.6)#224
12. Kenansville 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#12 12.4% (+87.6)#262
13. Clarkton 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#13 12.4% (+87.6)#284
14. Barker Ten Mile 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#14 12.4% (+87.6)#303
15. Prospect 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#15 12.4% (+87.6)#353
16. Hayesville 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#16 12.4% (+87.6)#357
17. Pink Hill 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#17 12.4% (+87.6)#396
18. Lewiston Woodville 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#18 12.4% (+87.6)#432
19. Roxobel 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#19 12.4% (+87.6)#442
20. Ashley Heights 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#20 12.4% (+87.6)#492
21. Watha 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#21 12.4% (+87.6)#620
22. Marietta 100.0% 14.5% (+85.5)#22 12.4% (+87.6)#773
23. Pittsboro 92.5% 14.5% (+78.0)#23 12.4% (+80.1)#930
24. New London 83.3% 14.5% (+68.9)#24 12.4% (+70.9)#1,037
25. Elrod 80.0% 14.5% (+65.5)#25 12.4% (+67.6)#1,098
26. Robbins 79.2% 14.5% (+64.7)#26 12.4% (+66.7)#1,118
27. Minnesott Beach 77.8% 14.5% (+63.3)#27 12.4% (+65.3)#1,144
28. Whitakers 76.9% 14.5% (+62.5)#28 12.4% (+64.5)#1,159
29. Ocean Isle Beach 75.0% 14.5% (+60.5)#29 12.4% (+62.6)#1,198
30. Warrenton 71.4% 14.5% (+57.0)#30 12.4% (+59.0)#1,285
31. Kill Devil Hills 70.5% 14.5% (+56.0)#31 12.4% (+58.1)#1,329
32. Nashville 70.1% 14.5% (+55.6)#32 12.4% (+57.7)#1,335
33. Harrells 69.2% 14.5% (+54.8)#33 12.4% (+56.8)#1,365
34. Hildebran 68.8% 14.5% (+54.3)#34 12.4% (+56.3)#1,373
35. Kelford 66.7% 14.5% (+52.2)#35 12.4% (+54.2)#1,469
36. Lake Park 65.7% 14.5% (+51.2)#36 12.4% (+53.2)#1,498
37. Troy 65.4% 14.5% (+50.9)#37 12.4% (+52.9)#1,505
38. Swepsonville 63.6% 14.5% (+49.2)#38 12.4% (+51.2)#1,563
39. Hertford 63.5% 14.5% (+49.0)#39 12.4% (+51.1)#1,577
40. Navassa 63.0% 14.5% (+48.5)#40 12.4% (+50.5)#1,597
41. Hampstead 62.7% 14.5% (+48.3)#41 12.4% (+50.3)#1,604
42. Princeton 62.5% 14.5% (+48.0)#42 12.4% (+50.1)#1,612
43. Hookerton 62.5% 14.5% (+48.0)#43 12.4% (+50.1)#1,620
44. Peletier 61.5% 14.5% (+47.1)#44 12.4% (+49.1)#1,652
45. Andrews 60.0% 14.5% (+45.5)#45 12.4% (+47.6)#1,712
46. Badin 59.1% 14.5% (+44.6)#46 12.4% (+46.7)#1,782
47. Welcome 59.0% 14.5% (+44.5)#47 12.4% (+46.6)#1,790
48. Buies Creek 58.2% 14.5% (+43.8)#48 12.4% (+45.8)#1,819
49. Denton 57.1% 14.5% (+42.7)#49 12.4% (+44.7)#1,847
50. Tarboro 55.5% 14.5% (+41.1)#50 12.4% (+43.1)#1,953
51. Grimesland 55.0% 14.5% (+40.5)#51 12.4% (+42.6)#1,966
52. Clyde 54.5% 14.5% (+40.1)#52 12.4% (+42.1)#1,982
53. Ronda 54.5% 14.5% (+40.1)#53 12.4% (+42.1)#1,990
54. Ahoskie 54.2% 14.5% (+39.8)#54 12.4% (+41.8)#2,004
55. North Wilkesboro 53.4% 14.5% (+38.9)#55 12.4% (+40.9)#2,043
56. Laurinburg 52.9% 14.5% (+38.5)#56 12.4% (+40.5)#2,073
57. Mount Olive 52.0% 14.5% (+37.5)#57 12.4% (+39.6)#2,131
58. Enfield 52.0% 14.5% (+37.5)#58 12.4% (+39.6)#2,133
59. Kings Grant 51.1% 14.5% (+36.7)#59 12.4% (+38.7)#2,166
60. East Flat Rock 50.7% 14.5% (+36.3)#60 12.4% (+38.3)#2,178
61. Cofield 50.0% 14.5% (+35.5)#61 12.4% (+37.6)#2,304
62. Louisburg 48.0% 14.5% (+33.5)#62 12.4% (+35.6)#2,468
63. Williamston 47.4% 14.5% (+32.9)#63 12.4% (+34.9)#2,496
64. Edenton 46.8% 14.5% (+32.3)#64 12.4% (+34.4)#2,532
65. Sharpsburg 46.3% 14.5% (+31.8)#65 12.4% (+33.8)#2,571
66. South Rosemary 45.5% 14.5% (+31.0)#66 12.4% (+33.0)#2,617
67. Youngsville 45.1% 14.5% (+30.7)#67 12.4% (+32.7)#2,648
68. Morganton 45.0% 14.5% (+30.6)#68 12.4% (+32.6)#2,651
69. Elon 44.4% 14.5% (+30.0)#69 12.4% (+32.0)#2,677
70. Elm City 44.4% 14.5% (+30.0)#70 12.4% (+32.0)#2,683
71. Harrisburg 43.8% 14.5% (+29.3)#71 12.4% (+31.3)#2,729
72. Roanoke Rapids 42.6% 14.5% (+28.1)#72 12.4% (+30.1)#2,834
73. Rocky Point 42.2% 14.5% (+27.8)#73 12.4% (+29.8)#2,856
74. Whiteville 42.0% 14.5% (+27.5)#74 12.4% (+29.5)#2,872
75. Ayden 41.9% 14.5% (+27.5)#75 12.4% (+29.5)#2,874
76. Maxton 41.4% 14.5% (+27.0)#76 12.4% (+29.0)#2,926
77. Cherokee 41.1% 14.5% (+26.6)#77 12.4% (+28.6)#2,958
78. Yanceyville 40.8% 14.5% (+26.4)#78 12.4% (+28.4)#2,975
79. Beaufort 40.6% 14.5% (+26.1)#79 12.4% (+28.1)#2,993
80. Southern Pines 39.1% 14.5% (+24.6)#80 12.4% (+26.7)#3,164
81. Boone 38.6% 14.5% (+24.2)#81 12.4% (+26.2)#3,193
82. Trent Woods 38.1% 14.5% (+23.6)#82 12.4% (+25.7)#3,233
83. Walkertown 37.9% 14.5% (+23.4)#83 12.4% (+25.4)#3,246
84. Jefferson 37.7% 14.5% (+23.3)#84 12.4% (+25.3)#3,254
85. Richfield 37.5% 14.5% (+23.0)#85 12.4% (+25.1)#3,277
86. Belwood 36.4% 14.5% (+21.9)#86 12.4% (+23.9)#3,385
87. Kinston 36.0% 14.5% (+21.5)#87 12.4% (+23.5)#3,439
88. Rowland 35.3% 14.5% (+20.8)#88 12.4% (+22.9)#3,504
89. Franklinville 34.8% 14.5% (+20.3)#89 12.4% (+22.3)#3,562
90. Tyro 34.5% 14.5% (+20.0)#90 12.4% (+22.0)#3,582
91. Reidsville 34.1% 14.5% (+19.7)#91 12.4% (+21.7)#3,613
92. Butner 33.3% 14.5% (+18.9)#92 12.4% (+20.9)#3,656
93. Pilot Mountain 33.3% 14.5% (+18.9)#93 12.4% (+20.9)#3,680
94. Tryon 33.3% 14.5% (+18.9)#94 12.4% (+20.9)#3,683
95. East Laurinburg 33.3% 14.5% (+18.9)#95 12.4% (+20.9)#3,773
96. Pembroke 32.7% 14.5% (+18.2)#96 12.4% (+20.3)#3,869
97. Walnut Cove 32.1% 14.5% (+17.7)#97 12.4% (+19.7)#3,929
98. Mayodan 32.0% 14.5% (+17.5)#98 12.4% (+19.6)#3,941
99. Bryson City 32.0% 14.5% (+17.5)#99 12.4% (+19.6)#3,942
100. Carolina Beach 31.5% 14.5% (+17.1)#100 12.4% (+19.1)#3,992

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina are:
#1
100.0%
#2
100.0%
#3
100.0%
#4
100.0%
#5
100.0%
#6
100.0%
#7
100.0%
#8
100.0%
#9
100.0%
#10
100.0%
What city has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina?
Forest Oaks has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the State of North Carolina?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in North Carolina is 14.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Males in the United States is 12.4%.